The Book Industry Study Group’s recent survey of 177  book industry machers.
(via www.bisg.org) posted on 06.08.10

The Book Industry Study Group’s recent survey of 177  book industry machers.

(via www.bisg.org)


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View)
posted on 04.20.10 Newspapers, Magazines and Books! Oh My!

I enjoyed this piece in Fortune about the future of books and newspapers and magazines.  The writer, Josh Quittner, starts out with a nice little anecdote about how his 12-year-old recently subscribed to Vogue.  

Each month Clem was excited when Vogue arrived. She’d rip into the issue and scamper up the stairs to her chambre à coucher, with enough enthusiasm to do Anna Wintour proud. But after digesting each issue, Clem would reappear with it hours later — only now a zillion Post-its jutted from its pages, stegosaurus-like.

Over time, one by one, those stegosauri began to stack up, spines out, in her closet. One day I decided to take a peek at the dinosaur graveyard to see what my daughter was tagging so furiously. It turned out that she was trying to annotate each issue, sorting the material by outfits, accessories, footwear, and other categories for later reference. I noticed that the more issues she tagged, the more frustrated she became. This was a lot of work. So why was she doing it?

“Don’t you get it?” my wife observed. “She’s trying to turn the magazine into a computer.”

Et voilà! Of course she was.

Read More


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 4 notes
posted on 04.01.10 #MargaretAtwood

All the arguing about media formats these days can drive you crazy. Or at least it drives me crazy. The reason? The suggestion that one form of communication is “better” than another—that one will “kill” the other.

I think every technology has its time and place. You can fight it, but what’s the point. Sometimes, I feel bad for formats that don’t have defenders. Like scrolls. Or cave painting. No one ever gets nostalgic for that stuff.

As the iPad sneaks up on us, this whole book/paper vs. screen debate is reaching a kind of fever pitch. Here is where I stand: If you want to read on paper, read on paper. If you want to read on a screen, do it. For the moment, we still have these options—if future generations want to eliminate paper, that’s their problem. They’ll certainly make some friends who are trees. In the end, it’s all still a form of reading and exchanging ideas, right? Does it matter how we do it? 

This quote I just read in this piece by Margaret Atwood, a Twitter fan, echoes my feelings. 

So what’s it all about, this Twitter? Is it signaling, like telegraphs? Is it Zen poetry? Is it jokes scribbled on the washroom wall? Is it John Hearts Mary carved on a tree? Let’s just say it’s communication, and communication is something human beings like to do.

Thanks for backing me up, Mags! 


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 5 notes

Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View)
posted on 03.03.10 Happy Birthday, Word!

A few months ago, I did a debate at Word in Greenpoint, not far from where yo vivo con mi esposo bonito, qui es d’Espana, y mi pero pequeño, qui es Poodle-Yorkie. (Am learning Spanish! Very slowly!).

I love Word. I bet you have to pass some sort of “cool” test to work there. “No, we don’t. Because tests are inherently uncool.” That’s the kind of thing I think that someone who worked there would say. Word, word.

Some of their employees debated me about whether or not certain things would become obsolete, and they each kicked my bum. They showed up with notes and stuff. I thought that I could just get by using my book as my notes, but then I realized that they’d been able to read “my notes.” And they didn’t even have to buy the book! They could’ve just read it at the store! Damn. So, their arguments were more like rebuttals to things that I wrote and researched more than a year beforehand. In most cases, I decided my best option would be to use my turn to tacitly agree with their sides and then have my dad answer questions from the audience. I just always ask myself: What Would Amos Do? He’d yap, yap, drop and roll.

Anyway, the point is: the debate was great, Word is great, and Amos is very wise. But the original point of all this was that I was going to say that I just read that Word’s new online store will take twenty percent off your purchase if you write “Happy Anniversary, WORD!” in the comments section at checkout. The site is WordBrooklyn.com. I believe in eating local, and books are mostly made of plants. Smaller stores are so often overshadowed by Amazon, which has liberal views about shopping in my undies. But Word has so much more personality and is a much more pleasant addition to the neighborhood than another DuaneReade. Also, I believe in supporting any bookstore that has its own basketball team.

Question from the audience: Will books become obsolete?

Answer from me: There’s no way to know, but I really do think that books will become obsolete sooner or later. Probably sooner than later. A generation or so from now, I think they will seem like relics of an faraway time. The Kindle, the iPhone, and other kinds of feats of technology and design and engineering that are trying to do a job that paper seemed to do so effortlessly, are still leaning heavily on the design of books, and I think things will probably continue in that direction for quite a while. But, in many cases, it’s like a game of telephone: Most modern computers were designed so that we input information using a system almost identical to the typewriter. Because it’s something that people were used to. Early typewriter designs leaned heavily on the look and operation of the piano. Because it’s something people were used to. Pianos took major hints from harpsichords, which incorporated design elements of the hurdygurdy, which which which blah. Digital pictures are still rectangular because film was rectangular. Would CDs have been made round if records hadn’t been round? One thing builds onto the next until the innermost Russian nesting doll packs up and marries a snow globe.

I’m going to wager that my great-great-grandkids will read from left-to-right (if they speak English) on rectangular screens or tickers or whatever. The text will still mostly be dark and the backgrounds will probably white, just like printed ink on paper was. But I doubt they’ll be reading actual books like we read today.

As someone who loves books, I feel sad about this. At the Word debate, a lot of people were emotional about this subject. Thing is, I love books because I grew up with them. I was, in someway, conditioned to love them. If they yelled and jumped on the table and started swinging brooms every time I brought one home, I would’ve felt differently. My parents loved them—they’d been raised the same way. But we already know that there are plenty of kids in today’s world who can’t read, or don’t get read to, or rarely come into contacts with books at all.  There are probably more people in this category than ever before (at least, since the invention of books). Are these kids as likely to grow up to be book lovers? And what if the first kind of “book” they ever come into contact with is actually some kind of eBook? The nostalgic element of emotional attachment shifts to a new technology, just like I know plenty of people who geek out about computers from the 1980s but couldn’t care less about typewriters. Or hurdygurdies! Funny thing is that it doesn’t seem much of a loss to us in the now. And the vast majority of the people who sang the gospel of the typewriter (and scorned its descendants) are now dead.

I don’t remember what I was talking about any more.

Anyway, go to WordBrooklyn.com. Or to the actual store. Tell ‘em I sent ya! I love books. If I had one wish, I’d ask that that they live on forever as actual objects and not just as a vestigial design element. Either that, or peace on Earth.


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 2 notes
‘Baby-Sitters Club’ Returns With Prequel
I admit it: I’m ex-ci-ted! I was a total Claudia. If I remember correctly, she was kin of the Miranda of the bunch.
Of course, some time has passed since the books first came out in 1986. I particularly like this quote from Motokio Rich’s article:

“Editors at Scholastic updated some of the references to technology and outdated fashions in the reissued books. So a ‘cassette player’ has become ‘headphones’ and a ‘perm’ has become ‘an expensive hairstyle.’”

(via NYTimes.com) posted on 12.30.09

‘Baby-Sitters Club’ Returns With Prequel

I admit it: I’m ex-ci-ted! I was a total Claudia. If I remember correctly, she was kin of the Miranda of the bunch.

Of course, some time has passed since the books first came out in 1986. I particularly like this quote from Motokio Rich’s article:

“Editors at Scholastic updated some of the references to technology and outdated fashions in the reissued books. So a ‘cassette player’ has become ‘headphones’ and a ‘perm’ has become ‘an expensive hairstyle.’”

(via NYTimes.com)


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 5 notes
posted on {12.29.09
“Sometimes when I hear of a book I want, I buy it and then I put it away with every reassurance that it will be read soon, forget about it, hear about it again, buy it again, and only realize my mistake when I place it next to its twin on the bookshelf. It’s an addiction of good intentions.”

— Joshua Ferris author of Then We Came to the End — Room For Debate, NYT. Do you think that people of the future will have this problem?


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 2 notes
posted on 12.22.09

The other day I made popcorn/chocolate chip/oatmeal/toffee cookies with Emily Gould for her web show, Cooking the Books. Truth be told, the cookies weren’t all that. But we had fun. Enjoy!


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View)
Just a quick word to remind you all that it’s not too late to order a copy of OBSOLETE and have it delievered in time for Christmas! Or for Hanukkah 2010! The book has been called “funny and charming” (Vice), “hilarious, sharp, well-researched” (Philadelphia City Paper), “fantastic” (Gizmodo). It’s also been called “great bathroom reading” (my mom).
Did I mention It’s only $10.85? Act now! It slices, it dices! But wait, there’s more! If you like the site, you’ll love the book.  There’s chocolate in my peanut butter! K, that’s really all the cheesy sales lines I can muster at the moment. Oh fine, here’s one more: Sorry, no CODs.
If you want to snap a photo of your copy of OBSOLETE sitting with something that is obsolete, email it to me and I’ll send you an obsolete motel key chain.
Merry merry! posted on 12.21.09

Just a quick word to remind you all that it’s not too late to order a copy of OBSOLETE and have it delievered in time for Christmas! Or for Hanukkah 2010! The book has been called “funny and charming” (Vice), “hilarious, sharp, well-researched” (Philadelphia City Paper), “fantastic” (Gizmodo). It’s also been called “great bathroom reading” (my mom).

Did I mention It’s only $10.85? Act now! It slices, it dices! But wait, there’s more! If you like the site, you’ll love the book.  There’s chocolate in my peanut butter! K, that’s really all the cheesy sales lines I can muster at the moment. Oh fine, here’s one more: Sorry, no CODs.

If you want to snap a photo of your copy of OBSOLETE sitting with something that is obsolete, email it to me and I’ll send you an obsolete motel key chain.

Merry merry!


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 1 note

kylebean.co.uk

kylebean.co.uk

kylebean.co.uk

kylebean.co.uk

kylebean.co.uk

kylebean.co.uk

kylebean.co.uk

kylebean.co.uk

posted on 12.17.09

British artist Kyle Bean, creator of the cell phone nesting dolls I posted about earlier this month, shows us his idea of the future of books. I wonder if this is really so far off…


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 1 note
A whole wall of books! I didn’t know so many still exist! Oh, it’s only a CGI rendering? Well, that explains that.
CGI Rendering Gives Us a Glimpse of the Stockholm Library of the Future - Stockholm library - Gizmodo posted on 12.07.09

A whole wall of books! I didn’t know so many still exist! Oh, it’s only a CGI rendering? Well, that explains that.

CGI Rendering Gives Us a Glimpse of the Stockholm Library of the Future - Stockholm library - Gizmodo


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 7 notes
posted on 11.25.09 The pen can write poetry or a death sentence.

Interesting piece at Short Stack about the new book eTrust: Forming Relationships in the Online World.

I like this argument that obsolete technology can be just as “dangerous” as the new vanguard.

“After the widespread adoption of online communication in the 1990’s, it did not take long before the dangers of sexually explicit material and personal indiscretion became the ideological bogeymen of the Internet. Such polar extremes are not especially useful because they tend to conflate information technologies with their social uses. The telephone can be used to reach a loved one, or to call in a bomb threat. The pen can write poetry or a death sentence.”

Short Stack - (washingtonpost.com)


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 3 notes

Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 1 note
posted on {11.15.09
“I am not ready to toss aside my books for all those familiar, vaguely arbitrary yet highly emotional reasons: for the feel, the smell, the covers, the page-turning pleasure. In a world where e-readers replace books I will also miss… knowing what subway readers are into. How else will we be able to make snap judgments about strangers? We’ll be forced to ask them what they are reading. We’ll be forced to engage.”

— M. Blake Montandon, On Late Adopting, Nooks & Me via Motherboard


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View) | 12 notes
posted on 11.01.09 Amos, obsolete.

It has recently been pointed out to me (nice use of passive voice, no?) that I have not written enough about a certain someone on this book’s site.

Who is these people who it who has been pointed outed this to me has been? I cannot categorize them. They are straight, gay, black, white, male, female, young and old. And that’s just the couple next door! Don’t even listen to me. Point: people keep asking me why I haven’t posted pictures of my dog.

Top three reasons:

1-I don’t want to scare people away from this site. In other words: I want people not to realize how dog-nutty I am. I don’t want anyone to think that I’m the kind of woman who loses it like a drunk toddler every time she sees something with four-legs on the street. Because I’m not. Shut up.

2-Ostensibly, this blog is about the book OBSOLETE and the general topic of obsolescence. Right? Right. Well, simply put, my dog isn’t obsolete. He also isn’t much for books and doesn’t ever have rhapsodizing thoughts about the ocean waves lapping against the beach and washing away the footprints of our lives. He’s more interested in Kant.

3-I hadn’t seen him in six weeks.

I’ve been traveling a lot, and so my 16-pound Yorkie/Poodle, Amos, has spent more than a month with my family and friends at my stepdad’s distillery where I’ve been living part-time for a few months. Amos is a rock-and-roll star in these parts.  Recently I was told that people sometimes call after touring the distillery just to say that Amos was their favorite part of the tour. I know, right?  So, anyway, while I was away, I kept getting reports about how great he was doing, how happy he was, etc. All good…except I felt a l bit bruised in the ego area. Wasn’t he normally so great and fun and loved and happy because I am so great and  fun and loved and happy? Because I’m not. Shut up.

Does this mean that my dog and I are judged as one in this world? I hope so. He is just a really great dog. So, that was part of it. I guess. I don’t mean to psychoanalyze myself, but I think the other part was that I just wanted to imagine he was pouting in a corner writing me sonnets. An hirsute Prince Charming. Needless to say, when we finally had our reunion a few days ago, he didn’t kiss my feet. He was like six out of 10 on the excited barometer. And that really wasn’t good enough for me.

He’s grown a little warmer towards me in the last few hours. This might because a few hours ago I set up a whole photo shoot for him. Bonding time! Just like JonBenét and Patsy Ramsey!

Why a photo shoot? To put him on this site. And why would it make sense to put a picture of him on your site? Well, someone pointed out to me that I have a series of photos on this blog of cute animals posing with obsolete objects. This is true. Well, now, said person said: Your book is OBSOLETE, and he’s cute… This is true: also, books are arguably becoming obsolete, and OBSOLETE is indeed a book. Soooo… I present:

CUTE ANIMALS WITH OBSOLETE OBJECTS: Vol. IV, Is. 1

It wasn’t until after I shot this that I saw that the page he was turned to was “Body Hair.”

Maybe Amos is obsolete after all.


Share/Save/Bookmark
Comments (View)

Page 1 of 2


Obsolete: An Encyclopedia of Once-Common Things Passing Us By on Facebook